When to resume bariatric surgery after COVID-19 pandemic?: results of patients' and surgeons' survey.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease 2019 is affecting most countries around the world, including Poland. In response, all elective surgeries have been postponed. We asked patients and surgeons when they want bariatric surgery to resume after pandemic. The main aim of the study was to determine patients' and surgeons' expectations about when to resume bariatric surgery regarding COVID-19 pandemic state. METHODS: The study was conducted in two groups: Group 1-bariatric patients; Group 2-bariatric surgeons. Two online surveys were distributed. RESULTS: A total of 895 patients, 299 before, 596 after surgery and 32 surgeons took part in survey. All patients and surgeons declared willingness to resume bariatric surgeries after pandemic and responded that they should be resumed immediately the World Health Organization announces end of pandemic (42%). The majority of patients before surgery answered that bariatric procedures should be resumed immediately the number of daily incidents begins to decrease (53%). In the patient group, current body mass index (p < 0.001) and contact with COVID+/quarantined persons (p < 0.001) had impact on the response to resumption of bariatric procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Patients opted to wait for bariatric surgery until the oncological queue has become shorter. Surgeons presented a readiness to resume both procedures in parallel.

Retirada difícil del balón intragástrico con colonización fúngica grave: ¿cómo lo hago? Respuesta-comentario del Grupo Español de Endoscopia Bariátrica / Difficult explant of intragastric balloon with severe fungal colonization: How do I do it? Response-commentary of the Spanish Bariatric Endoscopy Group

No disponible

Standardization of Bariatric Metabolic Procedures: World Consensus Meeting Statement.

BACKGROUND: Standardization of the key measurements of a procedure's finished anatomic configuration strengthens surgical practice, research, and patient outcomes. A consensus meeting was organized to define standard versions of 25 bariatric metabolic procedures. METHODS: A panel of experts in bariatric metabolic surgery from multiple continents was invited to present technique descriptions and outcomes for 4 classic, or conventional, and 21 variant and emerging procedures. Expert panel and audience discussion was followed by electronic voting on proposed standard dimensions and volumes for each procedure's key anatomic alterations. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement. RESULTS: The Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Standardization World Consensus Meeting (BMSS-WOCOM) was convened March 22-24, 2018, in New Delhi, India. Discussion confirmed heterogeneity in procedure measurements in the literature. A set of anatomic measurements to serve as the standard version of each procedure was proposed. After two voting rounds, 22/25 (88.0%) configurations posed for consideration as procedure standards achieved voting consensus by the expert panel, 1 did not attain consensus, and 2 were not voted on. All configurations were voted on by ≥ 50% of 50 expert panelists. The Consensus Statement was developed from scientific evidence collated from presenters' slides and a separate literature review, meeting video, and transcripts. Review and input was provided by consensus panel members. CONCLUSIONS: Standard versions of the finished anatomic configurations of 22 surgical procedures were established by expert consensus. The BMSS process was undertaken as a first step in developing evidence-based standard bariatric metabolic surgical procedures with the aim of improving consistency in surgery, data collection, comparison of procedures, and outcome reporting.

The bariatric physician.

Obesity is a rapidly increasing problem that has wide implications for the National Health Service. At present, obesity is not being addressed in a joined-up and standardised manner. This has downstream effects for the health service, the economy and society as a whole. As highlighted by a recent RCP report, there is a need for a new class of dedicated specialists who can evaluate individuals with health problems that are related to obesity, direct their care in a coordinated fashion, act as an advocate for their needs and be able to liaise with multiple different services to improve the provision of patient care. In this article, we discuss the role of this specialist - the bariatric physician.

Adolescent bariatric surgery program characteristics: the Teen Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (Teen-LABS) study experience.

The number of adolescents undergoing weight loss surgery (WLS) has increased in response to the increasing prevalence of severe childhood obesity. Adolescents undergoing WLS require unique support, which may differ from adult programs. The aim of this study was to describe institutional and programmatic characteristics of centers participating in Teen Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (Teen-LABS), a prospective study investigating safety and efficacy of adolescent WLS. Data were obtained from the Teen-LABS database, and site survey completed by Teen-LABS investigators. The survey queried (1) institutional characteristics, (2) multidisciplinary team composition, (3) clinical program characteristics, and (4) clinical research infrastructure. All centers had extensive multidisciplinary involvement in the assessment, pre-operative education, and post-operative management of adolescents undergoing WLS. Eligibility criteria and pre-operative clinical and diagnostic evaluations were similar between programs. All programs have well-developed clinical research infrastructure, use adolescent-specific educational resources, and maintain specialty equipment, including high weight capacity diagnostic imaging equipment. The composition of clinical team and institutional resources is consistent with current clinical practice guidelines. These characteristics, coupled with dedicated research staff, have facilitated enrollment of 242 participants into Teen-LABS.

Use of individual surgeon versus surgical team approach: surgical outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in an Asian Medical Center.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been shown to improve both the health and the quality of life of morbidly obese patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of using a team approach to LRYGB versus an individual surgeon at a medical center. METHODS: Data were collected from 200 consecutive patients undergoing LRYGB for morbid obesity from August 2005 to February 2008. Groups 1 and 2 included 50 patients each who underwent surgery and were cared for by the same surgeon. Group 3 included the next 100 consecutive patients, who underwent LRYGB by the same surgeon but who were cared for by a dedicated bariatric team. RESULTS: For the 76 men (38%) and 124 women (62%) in the study, the excess weight loss at 1 and 3 months of follow-up did not differ; however, it was significantly different at 6 and 12 months. At the mean follow-up period, 30% of group 1, 6% of group 2, and 8% of group 3 had experienced complications. Most complications in group 1 occurred early and were related to the surgical technique; however, in groups 2 and 3, the complications related to the technique were markedly reduced. Men were 4.57 times as likely as women to experience complications related to bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: A team-based approach is a better option for patients undergoing LRYGB than care by a single surgeon. With an experienced bariatric surgeon, the team approach resulted in shorter operative times and shorter hospital stays, with the same rate of complications.

A successful model of setting up a bariatric practice.

Vital for any surgeon choosing to perform bariatric surgery is to be financially savvy. Establishing a practice is not a simple matter. This article will describe how physicians can establish their practice in weight loss medicine. To better insure success, wisdom dictates that one perform a geographical study with respect to (1) obesity in the population, (2) number of bariatric surgeons in the area, (3) the nature of the insurance companies, (4) the type of insurance (health maintenance organization, HMO versus private pay versus Medicare, Medicaid, etc.), and (5) the leverage that the practice might be able to acquire (what is not being done by your competitors). To improve the financial strength of your practice, (1) learn what must be improved within your practice; (2) increase the ratio of time in the operating room to time in the office; (3) increase the number of patients referred to you. Most important is flexibility; the only people who really survive are chameleons because only chameleons adapt to different situations. Setting up a bariatric practice can be quite difficult, especially in the academic setting, but it is not impossible. A team approach is essential, whether one is speaking of a team of characteristics that make an office suitable, a team of experts within the office to appropriately evaluate patients, a team of professionals in the office to ensure efficient insurance approval, or a team of persons in the operating room to ensure that the surgery is optimized. The local environment must always be kept in mind.

Avoiding embezzlement in the bariatric practice office.

There is an increase in the number of embezzlement problems in medical offices. Physicians may be unfamiliar with methods to avoid or limit this problem. Because multiple charges are common in bariatric clinics, they are especially at risk for this problem. In this article, we discuss internal control measures to avoid embezzlement.

Shared medical appointments: new concept for high-volume follow-up for bariatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Shared medical appointments (SMAs) are a new model in patient care. This model was designed to improve patients' access to their physicians and improve physician productivity. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with SMAs after bariatric surgery. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients who were followed up after bariatric surgery were retrospectively reviewed. The type of bariatric surgery and type of medical appointment were recorded, as were the patients' replies to the evaluation questionnaires in the SMA group. RESULTS: From April 2004 to December 2004, 277 individual visits were conducted; 242 visits for patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 35 visits for patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric banding. Thirty-three SMAs occurred during that period--28 SMAs for patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and 5 SMAs for patients who underwent laparoscopic gastric banding. Of the patients who initially participated in an SMA, 91% scheduled a subsequent SMA, and 96% indicated that they would recommend SMAs to others. On a scale of 1 to 5 (1, poor and 5, excellent), patients graded their overall experience with SMAs as 4.5. Other parameters in the questionnaire all ranked between 4 and 5. The average waiting period for an appointment before the implementation of SMAs was 57.7 days (range 50-65) for new patients and 50 days (range 20-72) for former patients. After the implementation of SMAs, the average waiting period was 25 days (range 8-42) for new patients (P = 0.0046) and 20.3 days (range 0-42) for former patients (P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The SMA offers the patient prompt access to medical care, enables high-volume follow-up, with high satisfaction rates.